Izzat al Rishq, member of the political bureau of Hamasreaffirmed this Saturday the will of the Palestinian group “shown from the beginning of the negotiations” to achieve “an integral agreement that ends the aggression in Gaza”, after yesterday the president of the United States, Donald Trumphe will accuse him of not wanting to sign any agreement.
“American statements overlook the true obstacle to all agreements: the Netanyahu governmentwhich hinders, evade and eludes its commitments, ”he told Rishq in a statement released in his official channels.
Newsletter return to the world
He also stressed that Trump accusations “Contradict” the evaluation of Qatar and Egypt, mediators together with the United States of the conflict, about their position that “expressed their satisfaction and appreciation.”
“We are surprised by the statements of US President Trump, and before him, of the special American envoy Witkoff, who contradict the evaluation of the mediators about the position of the movement and are not coherent with the course of the negotiation process, which was registering real advances,” he adds.
In the note, he also ensures that his last response to the text for a high 60 -day fire driven by USA It was “positive and flexible to all comments”, but asks that “their clauses be strengthened.”
Palestinian militants of the Radical Islamist Movement Hamas are deployed near the headquarters of Pro-Fatah security services during clashes in the city of Gaza, on June 14, 2007. (Photo by Mahmud Hams / AFP).
/
“In particular, those related to the humanitarian aspect, guaranteeing the massive flow of aid and its distribution through the United Nations and their authorized agencies, without Israeli interference. We emphasize the need for withdrawal maps”, Details in the statement.
And add: “We were interested in reducing the extension of the damping areas where the occupation will remain during the 60 days and avoid densely populated areas to ensure the return of the majority of our people to their homes. ”
These demands are those that collide with the position of the Israeli governmentwhich has always been against the total withdrawal of its enclave troops arguing that it does so for “security reasons” and in none of the drafts has promised to guarantee the definitive purpose of its offensive.
